London Fog Cake

First, I have to address the elephant in my room. To all the people who left supportive comments of a previous post that I have since deleted, either on Facebook or here, Thank you so much!

I mainly wanted the conference organizers to hear me, and I think they did. Whether they learn from it or not is now up to them. Me deleting a message is not an apology. I still hold the same views.

I still feel very strongly that a photographer, whether professional or amateur, shouldn’t be taking pictures of people in public who do not wish to be photographed. And said pictures certainly shouldn’t be published, or shown to a room of 400+ people at a conference. It may not be against the law in some places, but I still feel that it is wrong to show pictures, either at a conference, or in a publication, or online, and to profit from such photos. It’s not edgy, it’s offensive.

When a photographer’s subject matter is a human being, that human should be respected. It seems odd that I have to type that out. And having a lack of consideration and respect for a photographer’s human subject shouldn’t be encouraged by someone who is looked up to in the photography world. But it was. At the conference. And to not object to this, as a conference organizer, is to accept and condone it. And I was offended, and that’s why I left the conference and posted something on the FB page of the conference, as well as here. And that is my right. And people chose to attack and bully me for holding those views.

So, again, thanks to all who understood that, or commented to offer their support and understanding. That really means a lot. And if those of you who disagree with me still feel the urge to tell me how I should have reacted to the conference, or to let me know how offended you are that I was offended, please don’t bother; your comments will be deleted.

Thanks!

Dave


Anyways….

egtc3

Let’s talk about cake!

egtc7

In my research for coming up with a name for this, I found that there are two types of drinks that are called London Fog.

egtc9

One is an alcoholic cocktail made with Gin and Pernod. The second one is more of a hot, non-alcoholic beverage containing Earl Grey tea, hot milk, and a shot of vanilla. (Starbucks had a London Fog Tea Latte, but I’ve never ordered it, nor do I know if they still offer it.)

eg190

Since this cake contains all the same ingredients that are in the second drink mentioned, I’m calling it a London Fog Cake based on that.

eg2 004

But what this really is, is my take on a Hot Milk Cake recipe. The main difference really is that I steeped a whole bunch (8 teabags!!) of Earl Grey tea into 2 cups of milk, then used the milk for the cake.

egtc6

I was also about to make this Earl Grey whipped cream, to use as a topping, but after tasting the cake itself, it already had plenty of the bergamot flavor. Less is More, right?

egtc8

Feel free to make the whipped cream as well, but I prefer the more subtle Earl Grey flavor of the cake itself. I think with or without Earl Grey whipping cream would be good, it just depends on your preference.

egtc4

I was inspired by Chloe Cramer of FoodlikeCake, to also try modifying the same recipe that she uses for her Hot Milk Cake, originally posted on Taste of Home. (Chloe has quite a collection of recipes, so make sure to check her awesome blog out! I’m inspired by her food stylings and photos!)

egtc2

I guess I could have called this an Earl Grey Hot Milk Cake, but I do like London Fog Cake better. Sort of gives it an aura of mystery, no?

egtc5

I just hope people don’t read this name and then expect the boozy, cocktail type of London Fog in cake form. Maybe that’s for another post. I do like Gin. I love Pernod, too, especially the color, which is a color similar to my previous post. Chartreuse! Hmmm….

egtc10

In the end, all I wanted to use for garnish were the last bit of summer fruit I had–blackberries, and a light dusting of confectioner’s sugar. I hope you enjoy!

egtc12

London Fog Cake

ingredients:

8 tea bags of good quality earl grey

2 cups milk, scalded or near boiling

10 Tablespoons (5 ounces) unsalted butter, cut into small 1/2 Tablespoon cubes

4 eggs, room temperature

2 cups sugar

1 Tablespoon vanilla extract

2 and 1/2 cups cake flour, presifted

2 and 1/2 teaspoons baking powder

1/2 teaspoons salt

method:

In a small to medium sauce pan over a stove, bring milk to a near boil, or until just about simmering, then promptly add the milk to a 2 cup capacity glass container containing 8 tea bags of good quality earl grey tea. Steep for at least 45 minutes, lifting and pressing the tea bags gently without puncturing bags. While this is steeping, you can get the other ingredients and do other steps before you need the milk.

Grease the bottom(s) of baking pan(s), line with parchment paper at the bottom(s), letting it hang out from two opposite sides, and greasing the parchment paper in the area that covers the bottom. I used two 6-inch square baking pans, but you can also use one 9-inch square pan. Set aside.

Preheat oven to 350 degrees F.

Sift flour, baking powder, and salt into a bowl and stir with a whisk. Set aside.

In a stand mixer with a balloon whisk attachment, add the four eggs, and mix on medium for about 1 minute, then gradually adding the sugar in three increments while mixing on medium-high speed for about 6-7 minutes, until tripled in volume. So, roughly every one to two minutes, I added about a third of the sugar at a time.

Add the vanilla extract and mix until incorporated, roughly less than a minute or so

When volume has tripled, remove from mixer and sift one third of the flour mixture over the bowl. Fold the flour gently but rapidly with a rubber spatula before sifting in the next increment of flour mixture to fold in. Complete folding and incorporating all the flour mixture into the batter.

Add the cubes of butter to a medium saucepan and pour the still warm milk over the butter. This should melt all the butter, but also reheat the milk along with the butter, until the first sign of it simmering or near boiling. Remove at once, and pour into the mixing bowl and fold immediately to incorporate the milk/butter mixture into the batter. Make sure to scrape the sides and bottom of the bowl to ensure that flour and milk mixture are incorporated into one batter.

Pour into prepared pan(s), dividing evenly if using more than one pan. If you use two 6-inch pans, you may have a very small amount left, maybe just enough for a couple of cupcakes.

Bake until golden brown on top and when the top surface no longer jiggles and may also be slightly cracked. A toothpick test should come out clean from the center. My cakes took roughly 40 minutes, but that’s because the 6-inch pans I used were filled up to almost the top with cake batter. If using a 9-inch square pan, it may be 20-25 minutes when you first check on it. Try not to check on it too soon, or too frequently.

Let cool in the cake pans for about 20 minutes, then turn over unto a wire rack to cool completely. Dust with confectioner’s sugar, or if you really want strong earl grey flavor, make the earl grey whipped cream recipe from the link above and use as topping. Garnish with blackberries, if desired.

egtc1

33 thoughts on “London Fog Cake

  1. Fog cake? what a name, but it looks so delicious I certainly wouldn’t mind having this for afternoon tea tomorrow. Dave you make such lovely cakes…I always enjoy visiting your blog!

    Like

    • Thank you for that! Yes, it was a conference on food blogging that had a photography session, which was all I was really interested in, anyway, and the guy presenting his work had some great food photos and videos.
      But. He also showed photos of people, mostly in restaurants, usually not aware that he was a professional or that he would be publishing and showing pictures of them, (not to mention making money off of their images), and he pretty much encouraged the crowd of 400+ conference goers that snapping pictures of people and not letting them know who you are, or not getting consent or permission, was perfectly acceptable and made for more interesting or edgy photos.
      And so I posted (on both this blog and the FB page for the conference) of my dissatisfaction with the conference in general, and specifically that I did not think it was right for this photographer to be encouraging us to disregard consent and that I was not going to go to the rest of the conference for that reason, and then many other conference goers took it personally and were upset that I “prejudged” the conference, that I shouldn’t have let it bother me so much, because swag, and because free food, and networking and lectures on branding and how could I insult the organizers and the companies involved and that it’s not fair to them. I noticed someone had used a “do not link dot com” on my site, which happens when an online forum wants to talk about a particular site without driving up the number of page hits, thus keeping it from getting higher up on search engines, and I thought that was so unfair because I was merely expressing my opinion. But ultimately I did not want to be known as “that guy who hates the food blogger conference.” So I deleted the posts. It just wasn’t worth all the negative responses.

      Like

      • Oh my goodness.

        This sounds very childish. I believe we are all entitled to our opinions, and especially in this particular case- where you’re merely stating your dissatisfaction with a photographers views on what is exceptable and what is not… your reaction seems justified, yet the other’s not so much.

        That’s really unfortunate that you had to listen to that kind of backlash from something so simple. If the conference was about food photography and food in general – then maybe that subject would be better left to other audiences, such as street photographers. They were bound to hear your opinion from you if not others from the crowd.

        I’m actually working on a piece right now regarding recipe copyright, the blogger etiquette rules, and the issue of legality vs. morality in the food blogging world. Once I get it posted I’ll be sure to link you to it, I’m sure you’d enjoy the points.

        For the record: the fans you’ll gain from the quality of your blog are the ones who count, not those merely peeking to see who “this pot stirrer is”, 😉

        Keep up the honest work!

        Liked by 2 people

  2. Oh Dave, I wish I could give you a hug, I hate bullies, especially cyber bullies hiding behind a computer screen and I totally agree with you, taking photos of people without their permission is an invasion of privacy, on a brighter note, the texture of your cake looks delicious, always enjoy your recipes:)

    Like

  3. First off, this cake looks delicious! I still don’t know where you can put all these baked goods away to, but I love seeing all your creations. Secondly, I’ve been offline for a couple of weeks so I missed reading your previous post about the conference. I am sorry you had to experience negativity when you were just expressing your views. I take issue with people photographing others, unawares, and with the intention of making profit. It is an invasion of privacy and disrespectful. I enjoy your blog and hope you continue being the thoughtful and charming baker you are.

    Like

    • 🙂 Thanks. You are very kind and I appreciate your thoughts on that, even if you didn’t get to see the post. It restores my faith that there are sane, considerate people in the food blogosphere that have ethics and respect. As for the things I make and where they go, sometimes I bring them in to work and other times, I either share with people I know, or if it a small enough thing, Ben and I eat it! I enjoy your blog, too! Thanks for stopping by and nice to see you again!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Drooling here… And as someone who’s been stalked and needs to protect my privacy, I appreciate your concern for those who do not wish to be photographed and pasted all over social media, or any media. Thank you, Dave, and hugs!!
    Signed-
    Two cubes down 🙂

    Like

  5. I have to point out a mistake in the instructions. I believe that you are supposed to mix the eggs and vanilla in a stand mixer, not flour and eggs. I followed the instructions blindly and ended up with a dough before I even got to add my sugar. So I tried again and everything went fine and now smelling soooo good in the oven. Can’t wait to try it!!!

    Like

  6. This looks great. I want to make cupcakes for a friend’s birthday and he loves tea. I think he would enjoy this. Will it work as a cupcake if I use a vanilla buttercream as frosting?

    Like

    • I wish I could tell how well it would work out as cupcakes, but I’ve never made them as cupcakes, and I know sometimes some recipes work better than others. I can’t imagine them being too bad. I say proceed with caution. Maybe test out a small batch? I hope it works out. Let me know how it turns out. I’m kind of curious too, because cupcakes sound like a good version for these! 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s